Hi,
I am doing DFPT calculations of the dielectric tensor. In runs perfectly when using PBE functional. However, for PBE with spin-orbit coupling I get
a) Non-symmetric tensor when local field are included
b) Non-diagonal ionic tensor contribution. The crystal is cubic.
The relevant output is
OUTCAR.DFPT.2: MACROSCOPIC STATIC DIELECTRIC TENSOR (including local field effects in DFT)
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- ------------------------------------------------------
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- 10.164766 -0.381979 0.168283
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- 0.168283 10.164766 -0.381979
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- -0.381979 0.168283 10.164766
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- ------------------------------------------------------
OUTCAR.DFPT.2: MACROSCOPIC STATIC DIELECTRIC TENSOR IONIC CONTRIBUTION
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- ------------------------------------------------------
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- 1.478542 0.082556 -0.038920
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- 0.082556 1.689562 -0.157362
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- -0.038920 -0.157362 1.295708
OUTCAR.DFPT.2- ------------------------------------------------------
And the input file is
ISTART=1 # Ground state obtained in previous calculation
PREC=Accurate
ENCUT = 460 # Maximum ENMAX from POTCAR
ALGO = Fast
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.05
ISIF=3
POTIM=0.5
EDIFF = 1E-8
EDIFFG = 1E-5
ISPIN=1
GGA=PE
KSPACING=0.22
LWAVE=.TRUE.
LCHARG=.FALSE.
#Opciones para interaccion spin-orbita
!ISYM = 0 # Swith off symmetry
LSORBIT=.TRUE.
LNONCOLLINEAR = .TRUE.
SAXIS= 0 0 1
GGA_COMPAT=.FALSE.
#For calculation of dielectric constant
LEPSILON= .TRUE.
LPEAD = .TRUE.
IBRION = 8
Thanks in advance
Eduardo Menendez
non-symmetric dielectric tensor in DFPT with spin-orbit coupling
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
- eariel
- Newbie
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 6:45 pm
- License Nr.: 490
non-symmetric dielectric tensor in DFPT with spin-orbit coupling
Last edited by eariel on Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: non-symmetric dielectric tensor in DFPT with spin-orbit coupling
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP