My Community

Dear List

My calculation in VASP involves a large super-cell and 17 atoms on it. With a single CPU it takes days, so the natural way to run VASP is in parallel mode i.e. try with different combinations of cpus ranging from 2 to 16 etc.

machine:
http://www.sara.nl/userinfo/lisa/description/index.html

But now I have some trivial doubts:

1. What part of the VASP really takes the advantageous of the parallel calculation?
Is it the evaluation of the time consuming integrals? or 3D-FFT ?

I “guess� if it is the case of integrals:
The number of CPUs should be the factor of the irreducible k-points, as we can see in the OUTCAR file.

In the case of FFT: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/guide/ ... 0000000000
The more cpus I use the more efficiency will be the result [is it ?]

I don’t know that my guesses are true or false:
Can anyone suggest how we can efficiently choose an optimum number of cpus?

2. NPAR
I also hope: I can use default setting for the NPAR and NPLANE in different combinations of the cpus.

But if I use say, 4 nodes(or more say, X) can I use the following?
NPAR=4(X)
LPLANE = .TRUE.

Does it fasts the calculation?


With thanks in advance and best regards

Krishna Mohan G P

Theor Chem
Universitiet Leiden

I don't know about the rest, but vasp is not parallelized over Kpoints, so more K-points slows you down, more CPU's speeds you up, but there is no need to get a relation between the number of IBZKPT and CPU's

About the Scaling, the only thing I noticed was that on the Huygens power5 machine the optimum number of CPU's was about: NBANDS/(20 to 25) Any Less and the communications starts to kill your gain.

Cheers
Danny

Hi Danny
bedankt for the mail!

this is a good thing that VASP is NOT parallelized over KPOINTS

time to play with cpus !

km