electron DOS smearing...
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:15 am
Dear VASP users,
I have a question regarding the different electronic smearing options in VASP:
when using Fermi smearing (ISMEAR = -1), to what quantity is the smearing (SIGMA) applied?
To be more specific: the Methfessel Paxton prescribes a smearing corresponding to the approximation of delta functions in energy delta(E-E_k) by functions with finite smearing widths. This induces a smearing of features in the electronic DOS.
What I wonder, regarding the Fermi smearing option in VASP, is whether the energy levels are similarly broadened in energy (as in a MP scheme of order zero), or wether it is just the _occupation numbers_ that follow the Fermi distribution?
The section of the manual on ISMEAR did not answer my question precisely, hence the post.
Since I get smoother electronic DOS curves with VASP upon increasing SIGMA (when using Fermi smearing, ISMEAR=-1) for a fixed CHGCAR, it seems to me that the energy levels are indeed broadened (by the derivative of the Fermi function?). Is this correct?
Thanks for your help.
Olivier
I have a question regarding the different electronic smearing options in VASP:
when using Fermi smearing (ISMEAR = -1), to what quantity is the smearing (SIGMA) applied?
To be more specific: the Methfessel Paxton prescribes a smearing corresponding to the approximation of delta functions in energy delta(E-E_k) by functions with finite smearing widths. This induces a smearing of features in the electronic DOS.
What I wonder, regarding the Fermi smearing option in VASP, is whether the energy levels are similarly broadened in energy (as in a MP scheme of order zero), or wether it is just the _occupation numbers_ that follow the Fermi distribution?
The section of the manual on ISMEAR did not answer my question precisely, hence the post.
Since I get smoother electronic DOS curves with VASP upon increasing SIGMA (when using Fermi smearing, ISMEAR=-1) for a fixed CHGCAR, it seems to me that the energy levels are indeed broadened (by the derivative of the Fermi function?). Is this correct?
Thanks for your help.
Olivier