Page 1 of 1
Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:07 pm
by karthik_hj
I was plotting the Band structure and DOS with and without SOC for an SnS2 hetero-structure. I already know from literature that they are semi-conducting. But when I use vdw tags also for DOS and BS calculations, it shows metallic nature. If I remove the tags, it turns semiconducting. My question is ,
1. Do we include vdw tags for Non-scf runs also i.e. DOS and BS calculations including SOC interactions? Or do we only give it initially for scf runs and then remove it when doing DOS and BS including SOC interactions
2. Why does vdw tags change the electronic properties like this?
3. Why doesn't it change when I do not give SOC tags
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:52 pm
by fabien_tran1
In order to help you, we need to know more details about the procedure that you used for the calculations. So, please describe precisely the steps of the calculations, and also show us the INCAR files of the SCF and non-SCF runs.
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:12 am
by karthik_hj
Procedure1 - INCAR1 attached
Step1: Optimisation of structure with vdw (No SOC)
Step2: DOS and BS calculation with vdw and SOC
Procedure2 - INCAR2 attached
Step1: Optimisation of structure with vdw (No SOC)
Step2: DOS and BS calculation without vdw and SOC
Procedure 1 is showing metallic nature and 2 is showing semiconducting. Band diagrams attached as pdf's.
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 9:02 am
by fabien_tran1
This is still not completely clear what procedures you used for the calculations. In total, there are 4 calculations, right? Please, provide the INCAR for each of these 4 calculations, such that I can really understand what you did.
For the moment I can just say the following:
Step 2 of procedure 1 should lead to a crash, because starting a calculation with LSORBIT=.TRUE. from a WAVECAR file that was generated from a previous calculation with LSORBIT=.FALSE. is not possible.
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 10:02 am
by karthik_hj
WAVECAR was not generated from the initial calculation. It ran as usual. The INCAR for the initial optimisations is attached. It is same for Step1 in procedure 1 and Step 1 in procedure 2
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2023 2:50 pm
by fabien_tran1
I still can not understand the procedures that you followed. Your explanations and naming of the INCAR files are confusing. Provide again all INCAR files with a proper naming and a clear description of the steps (and specify CLEARLY which INCAR is associated with which step).
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:28 am
by karthik_hj
My question is; do we include vdw tags also for the band structure and dos calculations?
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2023 5:33 am
by karthik_hj
Procedure1 - BS attached
Step1: Optimisation of structure with vdw (No SOC) INCAR1
Step2: DOS and BS calculation with vdw and SOC included INCAR2
Procedure2 - BS attached
Step1: Optimisation of structure with vdw (No SOC) INCAR3
Step2: DOS and BS calculation without vdw and SOC included INCAR4
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:46 am
by fabien_tran1
A few points:
1) The calculation that does not include vdW (INCAR4) uses the functional PBE. Is it really PBE that you want to use for calculating BS and DOS?
2) PBE and optB88-vdW should lead to very similar BS. What is more important for the BS is SOC.
3) I do not know why you get a metal from BS, but a semiconductor from procedure 2.
4) As explained for the
MAGMOM tag:
-One value per atom has to be specified when LSORBIT=.FALSE.
-Three values per atom have to be specified when LSORBIT=.TRUE.
What is specified for MAGMOM is the same in all your INCAR files, and I guess that what you specified in INCAR2 and INCAR4 is wrong and should be (with magnetic moment oriented along z):
MAGMOM = 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 ...
Anyway, I suggest to follow these steps:
1) Do a geometry optimization with the optB88-vdW functional. If including SOC leads to a lengthy calculation, then do not include it. I don't think that SOC is so important for the geometry.
2) At the geometry obtained at step 1 (do "cp CONTCAR POSCAR"), do a SCF calculation (but no geometry optimization) with optB88-vdW and including SOC (and correct specification for MAGMOM). Include "LORBIT=11" in INCAR, but not "ICHARG=11".
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:04 am
by karthik_hj
1. Yes I wish to use PBE only
I shall change the MAGMOM tag to what you have said. Could you please let me know the IBRION and ISIF to be put if no geometry optimisation is needed?
Re: Band structure SOC and optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:15 am
by fabien_tran1
As you did in INCAR2 and INCAR4: IBRION=-1 and NSW=0. It does not matter for ISIF. This is what is explained at
IBRION,
NSW and
ISIF.