Symmetry in dielectric tensor
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 4:54 pm
Hello,
I've followed the `Dielectric properties of SiC` tutorial to compute both the IPA and RPA dielectric functions. In the OUTCAR of the IPA calculation, six components (xx, yy, zz, yz, zx, and xy) are provided for both the real and imaginary parts, respectively. In the OUTCAR of the RPA calculation, a generic 3x3 matrix is printed (with both real and imaginary parts). I've a couple of questions:
1. In the IPA calculation, we should treat the tensor as a symmetric (not Hermitian) matrix, right? Also, are the off-diagonal components symmetrized , e.g. yz := (yz + zy)/2 ?
2. In the RPA calculation, since the full matrix is given, can I expect it to be a generic complex matrix? I mean non-symmetric or non-Hermitian?
I am asking these questions because I am interested in magneto-optic properties (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optic_effect). In this case, the dielectric tensor can be a generic matrix due to the internal magnetic field (which breaks time-reversal symmetry), without the need of an external magnetic field.
3. If the IPA and RPA calculations are impossible to explore such effects, any other suggestions?
Thanks!
I've followed the `Dielectric properties of SiC` tutorial to compute both the IPA and RPA dielectric functions. In the OUTCAR of the IPA calculation, six components (xx, yy, zz, yz, zx, and xy) are provided for both the real and imaginary parts, respectively. In the OUTCAR of the RPA calculation, a generic 3x3 matrix is printed (with both real and imaginary parts). I've a couple of questions:
1. In the IPA calculation, we should treat the tensor as a symmetric (not Hermitian) matrix, right? Also, are the off-diagonal components symmetrized , e.g. yz := (yz + zy)/2 ?
2. In the RPA calculation, since the full matrix is given, can I expect it to be a generic complex matrix? I mean non-symmetric or non-Hermitian?
I am asking these questions because I am interested in magneto-optic properties (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optic_effect). In this case, the dielectric tensor can be a generic matrix due to the internal magnetic field (which breaks time-reversal symmetry), without the need of an external magnetic field.
3. If the IPA and RPA calculations are impossible to explore such effects, any other suggestions?
Thanks!