Query regarding Optical Properties Calculation for 2D Material in VASP.
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 7:50 am
Hello VASP Community,
I hope this message finds you well. I am working on calculations of optical properties for a 2D material using VASP and the SUMO package. While analyzing the data, I observed certain aspects that I would like to discuss and seek clarification on. Here are the details:
In the output data, I have extracted the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function tensor for my 2D material. The data appears as follows:
Based on my computed result of a 2-dimensional material system, I have noticed that the real part of the dielectric function in the last four columns (xx, yy, zz, and xy) is not zero, contrary to my expectations. I understand that in a 2D material, the properties calculated in the third dimension should ideally be zero or very large, if any.
I have observed a similar behavior in the imaginary part of the calculated results as well. I'm trying to interpret these findings and would greatly appreciate your insights on this matter. Could you please help me understand why the calculated values in these dimensions are not zero, especially considering the 2D nature of the material?
Thank you very much for your time and assistance. I look forward to your valuable guidance and suggestions.
Attached please find the above-mentioned computed result.
Best regards,
Zhao
I hope this message finds you well. I am working on calculations of optical properties for a 2D material using VASP and the SUMO package. While analyzing the data, I observed certain aspects that I would like to discuss and seek clarification on. Here are the details:
In the output data, I have extracted the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function tensor for my 2D material. The data appears as follows:
Code: Select all
...
<real>
<array>
<!-- Dimension and field information -->
...
<set>
<r> Energy_value xx_value yy_value zz_value xy_value yz_value zx_value </r>
...
<!-- More data points -->
...
</set>
</array>
</real>
<imag>
<array>
<!-- Dimension and field information -->
...
<set>
<r> Energy_value xx_value yy_value zz_value xy_value yz_value zx_value </r>
...
<!-- More data points -->
...
</set>
</array>
</imag>
...
I have observed a similar behavior in the imaginary part of the calculated results as well. I'm trying to interpret these findings and would greatly appreciate your insights on this matter. Could you please help me understand why the calculated values in these dimensions are not zero, especially considering the 2D nature of the material?
Thank you very much for your time and assistance. I look forward to your valuable guidance and suggestions.
Attached please find the above-mentioned computed result.
Best regards,
Zhao