LDIPOL with GW0
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:15 pm
- License Nr.: 5-1441
- Location: Germany
LDIPOL with GW0
Dear all,
I converged a slab calculation using the dipole correction in z direction using LDIPOL and IDIPOL (algo=Exact at EDIFF=1.0E10-8) and then ran the ScGW0 calculations using the input as:
ALGO = SCGW0
ENCUTGW = 150
NOMEGA = 72
ISMEAR = -5
ISPIN = 2
SIGMA = 0.01
KPAR = 5
NPAR = 18
NBANDS = 108
LREAL = False
MAXMEM = 13500
NELM = 4
Next, I introduced in the the same INCAR for the ScGW0 calculations, the two variables for dipole correction, and ran the calculations again:
IDIPOL = 3
LDIPOL = True
And the results that I get are very different. The HOMO level shifts down by more than 1.2 eV which is a huge value, as you can see here http://snag.gy/2BvqC.jpg. [the x axis is the iterations over G and the orange and green denote the cases without and with dipole correction during the ScGW0 method]
Is it the right way for doing ScGW0 calculations for slabs to introduce dipole correction in the ScGW0 part of the calculation or should I not do it ? Any insights are appreciated.
I converged a slab calculation using the dipole correction in z direction using LDIPOL and IDIPOL (algo=Exact at EDIFF=1.0E10-8) and then ran the ScGW0 calculations using the input as:
ALGO = SCGW0
ENCUTGW = 150
NOMEGA = 72
ISMEAR = -5
ISPIN = 2
SIGMA = 0.01
KPAR = 5
NPAR = 18
NBANDS = 108
LREAL = False
MAXMEM = 13500
NELM = 4
Next, I introduced in the the same INCAR for the ScGW0 calculations, the two variables for dipole correction, and ran the calculations again:
IDIPOL = 3
LDIPOL = True
And the results that I get are very different. The HOMO level shifts down by more than 1.2 eV which is a huge value, as you can see here http://snag.gy/2BvqC.jpg. [the x axis is the iterations over G and the orange and green denote the cases without and with dipole correction during the ScGW0 method]
Is it the right way for doing ScGW0 calculations for slabs to introduce dipole correction in the ScGW0 part of the calculation or should I not do it ? Any insights are appreciated.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: LDIPOL with GW0
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP