Dear all,
Have anyone got correct eigenvalues for S2(rest atom induced) surface states?
In the literatures, S2 should be 0.7~0.9 eV below Fermi level.
But my result is 0.5~0.7 eV.
Si(111)-7x7 DAS structure was modeled by 6-layer slab.
Total number of atoms in unit cell is 347 including bottom 49 hydrogens.
I can not understand why VASP gives 0.2 eV higher S2 states.
Could you give any comments?
Regards,
Geunsik
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
electronic surface states of Si(111)-7x7
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:38 am
electronic surface states of Si(111)-7x7
Last edited by leegeunsik on Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
electronic surface states of Si(111)-7x7
have you converged all input parameters as well as the ionic and electronic structure carefully?
by 'literature', do you mean experiments or calculations using different methods
by 'literature', do you mean experiments or calculations using different methods
Last edited by admin on Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:38 am
electronic surface states of Si(111)-7x7
I have used default values for EDIFFG, ENCUT.
Also the convergence w.r.t. slab-thickness and energy-cut were checked. Both LDA and GGA potentials were tried.
As to 'literatures', the experimental value is -0.9 eV.
Also PW-calculation by Brommer (Jpan. J. Appl. Phys. 32 pp.1360) gives S2 of -0.7~-0.9 eV.
Also the convergence w.r.t. slab-thickness and energy-cut were checked. Both LDA and GGA potentials were tried.
As to 'literatures', the experimental value is -0.9 eV.
Also PW-calculation by Brommer (Jpan. J. Appl. Phys. 32 pp.1360) gives S2 of -0.7~-0.9 eV.
Last edited by leegeunsik on Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:58 am, edited 1 time in total.