How to understand two minimum energy paths for one diffusion?
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:48 pm
How to understand two minimum energy paths for one diffusion?
Dear all,
I used CI-NEB calcualtions to study interstitial diffusion in fcc iron. Two different initial interpolations were done:
1)one is to interpolate 11 images linearly between the two adjacent octahedral sites(from 0 0 0.5 to 0.5 0.5 0.5 );
2)the another one is to include tetrahedral site, first did a linearly interpolating between one O-site to the T site (from 00 0.5 to 0.25 0.25 0.25), we added five images between these two end points; secondly we did a linearly interpolating between the T site to another O-site (from 0.25 0.25 0.25 to 0.5 0.5 0.5), we added five images between these two end points. Then it turned out we interpolate 11 images which include a T-site between the two adjacent O-site(from 0 0 0.5 to 0.5 0.5 0.5)
We did the CI-NEB calculations for these two interpolation with different initial guess (which means O-O and O-T-O initial guess), the corresponding chains of images all converged. The energy results of the 13 images in the MEP are as follows:
For O-O: 0, 0.1, 0.39, 1.06, 1.82, 2.40, 2.60, 2.39, 1.82, 1.06, 0.38, 0.1, 0 (non spin)
For O-T-O : 0, 0.12, 0.52, 1.37, 2.12, 2.56, 2.65, 2.57, 2.14, 1.39, 0.54, 0.12, 0 (non spin)
For spin calculation:
O-O: 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.60, 0.85, 0.93, 0.92, 0.93, 0.87, 0.62, 0.26, 0.1, 0
O-T-O: 0, 0.15, 0.35, 0.92, 1.51, 2.01, 2.19, 2.02, 1.54, 0.93, 0.37, 0.16, 0
I have two questions:
1)If all the calculation converged, does it mean the two MEP (O-O, O-T-O) are possible, or only the smaller diffusion energy one is possible?(that is for non spin, the O-O which has 2.60 is possible)?
2)For the spin calcualtion, there is so large difference between the O-O MEP and O-T-O MEP, I don't know how to understand this?
Any comments are welcomed, Thanks!
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
I used CI-NEB calcualtions to study interstitial diffusion in fcc iron. Two different initial interpolations were done:
1)one is to interpolate 11 images linearly between the two adjacent octahedral sites(from 0 0 0.5 to 0.5 0.5 0.5 );
2)the another one is to include tetrahedral site, first did a linearly interpolating between one O-site to the T site (from 00 0.5 to 0.25 0.25 0.25), we added five images between these two end points; secondly we did a linearly interpolating between the T site to another O-site (from 0.25 0.25 0.25 to 0.5 0.5 0.5), we added five images between these two end points. Then it turned out we interpolate 11 images which include a T-site between the two adjacent O-site(from 0 0 0.5 to 0.5 0.5 0.5)
We did the CI-NEB calculations for these two interpolation with different initial guess (which means O-O and O-T-O initial guess), the corresponding chains of images all converged. The energy results of the 13 images in the MEP are as follows:
For O-O: 0, 0.1, 0.39, 1.06, 1.82, 2.40, 2.60, 2.39, 1.82, 1.06, 0.38, 0.1, 0 (non spin)
For O-T-O : 0, 0.12, 0.52, 1.37, 2.12, 2.56, 2.65, 2.57, 2.14, 1.39, 0.54, 0.12, 0 (non spin)
For spin calculation:
O-O: 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.60, 0.85, 0.93, 0.92, 0.93, 0.87, 0.62, 0.26, 0.1, 0
O-T-O: 0, 0.15, 0.35, 0.92, 1.51, 2.01, 2.19, 2.02, 1.54, 0.93, 0.37, 0.16, 0
I have two questions:
1)If all the calculation converged, does it mean the two MEP (O-O, O-T-O) are possible, or only the smaller diffusion energy one is possible?(that is for non spin, the O-O which has 2.60 is possible)?
2)For the spin calcualtion, there is so large difference between the O-O MEP and O-T-O MEP, I don't know how to understand this?
Any comments are welcomed, Thanks!
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Last edited by tracy on Thu May 21, 2009 3:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: How to understand two minimum energy paths for one diffusion?
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP