charged defect with setting NELECT
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:34 am
charged defect with setting NELECT
Dear Vasp Users.
I'm now attempting to calculate the charged impurity
where Fe(+3) is replaces by Zn(+2).
The valence electron number (not replaced by Zn) which
is calculated by ZVAL (in POTCAR file) is 582 and
if we replace one Fe by Zn, the valence electron number
is 580.
The impurity state Zn_{fe}(-1) state.(Kroger-Vink notation)
So we add one electron to the replaced Zn super cell and
we set NELECT = 581. But the number is odd, does it mean
system become metallic ? Or background charge make system
insulater ? I want to system be insulator.
I'm now attempting to calculate the charged impurity
where Fe(+3) is replaces by Zn(+2).
The valence electron number (not replaced by Zn) which
is calculated by ZVAL (in POTCAR file) is 582 and
if we replace one Fe by Zn, the valence electron number
is 580.
The impurity state Zn_{fe}(-1) state.(Kroger-Vink notation)
So we add one electron to the replaced Zn super cell and
we set NELECT = 581. But the number is odd, does it mean
system become metallic ? Or background charge make system
insulater ? I want to system be insulator.
Last edited by okuno on Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: charged defect with setting NELECT
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP