I'm doing density of states calculations to study the bonding during adsorption. But it seems as though the energies reported in the DOSCAR file don't have a meaningful reference. But I would like to see how the DOS changes during the adsorption process.
For instance, H2S adsorbed on Pd(111).
The lowest energy s orbital shifts by ~2.5 eV from the gas phase molecule to the adsorbed molecule. I don't believe that there really should be a shift, since most of the bonding should take place with the p orbitals of S. Thus, I should be able to line up the DOS plots before and after adsorption, and the lowest energy orbitals should line up.
Am I wrong? Or is the energy not aribtrary at all?
how are the DOS energies referenced?
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:37 pm
how are the DOS energies referenced?
Last edited by mhyman on Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
how are the DOS energies referenced?
usually there are 2 ways to align the energy scales of a DOS
1) shift them with respect to the Fermi level (E_fermi=0). This is the standard method.
2) for slab and adsorption calculations you may align the Es with respect to the "vacuum level"(=0): In a repeated slab calculation, the zero-point of the energy scale can be estimated from the constant - potential region in the center of the vacuum (of course, only if the vacuum between the slabs is thick enough) by setting LVTOT=true in INCAR and plotting the planar-averaged potentials along the surface normal (vtotav.f, file LOCPOT).
3) I would not align them with respect to the S-s-band minimum, because this might already undergo a certain shift. (low-lying Pd
core states might be appropriate, but they are not available straightforwardly from VASP.
1) shift them with respect to the Fermi level (E_fermi=0). This is the standard method.
2) for slab and adsorption calculations you may align the Es with respect to the "vacuum level"(=0): In a repeated slab calculation, the zero-point of the energy scale can be estimated from the constant - potential region in the center of the vacuum (of course, only if the vacuum between the slabs is thick enough) by setting LVTOT=true in INCAR and plotting the planar-averaged potentials along the surface normal (vtotav.f, file LOCPOT).
3) I would not align them with respect to the S-s-band minimum, because this might already undergo a certain shift. (low-lying Pd
core states might be appropriate, but they are not available straightforwardly from VASP.
Last edited by admin on Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:07 am
- License Nr.: 395
how are the DOS energies referenced?
Admin,
Is it true that the DOS of two different systems, for instance an Fe (100) and an Al (100) slab, cannot be compared because there is a constant energy shift in the eigenvalue scale between the two? If that's the case. the two methods you described above to align the DOS scales won't work because there is an unknown shift between the two energy scales. In what situations will that unknown shift not be present?
Best Regards
modey3
Is it true that the DOS of two different systems, for instance an Fe (100) and an Al (100) slab, cannot be compared because there is a constant energy shift in the eigenvalue scale between the two? If that's the case. the two methods you described above to align the DOS scales won't work because there is an unknown shift between the two energy scales. In what situations will that unknown shift not be present?
Best Regards
modey3
Last edited by Modey3 on Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.