Hello
I am using BSE after a G0W0 run to calculate optical properties. However, the BSE calculated dielectric maxima for both real and imaginary parts are significantly smaller than what are expected from DFT, RPA, and G0W0.
For G0W0 the gas-run file reads as
<dielectricfunction comment="HEAD OF MICROSCOPIC DIELECTRIC TENSOR (INDEPENDENT PARTICLE)">
<imag>
<array>
<dimension dim="1">gridpoints</dimension>
<field>energy</field>
<field>xx</field>
<field>yy</field>
<field>zz</field>
<field>xy</field>
<field>yz</field>
<field>zx</field>
<set>
<r> 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 </r>
<r> 0.8393 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 </r>
<r> 1.6779 0.0032 0.0033 0.0032 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 </r>
<r> 2.5150 0.0055 0.0056 0.0054 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 </r>
<r> 3.3499 0.0091 0.0093 0.0091 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0000 </r>
<r> 4.1820 0.0185 0.0190 0.0270 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 </r>
<r> 5.0106 0.1280 0.1406 0.1638 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0022 </r>
<r> 5.8352 1.1394 1.2418 0.8218 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0177 </r>
<r> 6.6551 5.0338 5.1649 3.8020 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0260 </r>
<r> 7.4699 6.1322 5.8544 5.6597 -0.0000 0.0000 -0.0248 </r>
<r> 8.2792 7.7896 7.8558 9.5690 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0323 </r>
<r> 9.0826 8.9027 8.9238 11.3536 0.0000 -0.0000 0.0536 </r>
<r> 9.8799 7.5521 7.6093 6.8165 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0092 </r>
<r> 10.6709 5.3003 5.2209 5.9151 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0270 </r>
whereas the from BSE
<r> 7.5676 1.5524 1.4509 0.7260 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0826 </r>
<r> 7.6076 1.6837 1.5338 0.7653 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0624 </r>
<r> 7.6476 1.8513 1.6187 0.8146 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0762 </r>
<r> 7.6877 2.0014 1.6520 0.8466 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.1037 </r>
<r> 7.7277 2.0286 1.6646 0.8376 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.1109 </r>
<r> 7.7678 1.9239 1.7172 0.8238 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.1037 </r>
<r> 7.8078 1.8056 1.8147 0.8409 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0845 </r>
<r> 7.8478 1.7050 1.8764 0.8895 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0448 </r>
<r> 7.8879 1.6229 1.8503 0.9422 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.0071 </r>
<r> 7.9279 1.5639 1.7933 0.9579 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.0534 </r>
<r> 7.9680 1.5537 1.7700 0.9369 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.0863 </r>
<r> 8.0080 1.6175 1.7967 0.9055 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.1070 </r>
<r> 8.0480 1.7098 1.8248 0.9011 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.1195 </r>
<r> 8.0881 1.7078 1.7923 0.9359 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.1264 </r>
<r> 8.1281 1.6034 1.7098 0.9950 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.1246 </r>
<r> 8.1682 1.5322 1.6382 1.0562 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.1101 </r>
<r> 8.2082 1.5606 1.6286 1.1000 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.0817 </r>
<r> 8.2482 1.6484 1.6863 1.1278 -0.0000 -0.0000 0.0301 </r>
<r> 8.2883 1.7394 1.7626 1.1596 -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0387 </r>
I use a 6x6x6 KPOINTS grid centered at the gamma. Changing
NBANDSO = 4
NBANDSV = 12
to higher values does affect the max dielectric function values but even at NBANDSO = 30 = NBANDSV, thes values still remain low.
Thanks-Nick
Small BSE calculated dielectric maxima
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:36 pm
Small BSE calculated dielectric maxima
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm
Re: Small BSE calculated dielectric maxima
Hi,
I see that you set ANTIRES=1 in your input. This approximation is only valid at zero frequency (dielectric constant) and the rest of the spectrum is not correctly reproduced. If you would like to calculate the spectrum, you should use ANTIRES=0 for the TDA or ANTIRES=2 for the full BSE.
I see that you set ANTIRES=1 in your input. This approximation is only valid at zero frequency (dielectric constant) and the rest of the spectrum is not correctly reproduced. If you would like to calculate the spectrum, you should use ANTIRES=0 for the TDA or ANTIRES=2 for the full BSE.