Monopole & Dipole correction

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
cyc99
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:38 am

Monopole & Dipole correction

#1 Post by cyc99 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:56 am

Dear users,

I want to get the total energy of ionized molecules like O2 anion, something like that. I used the IDIPOLE = 4 to correct the monopole and dipole interactions. I thought that the corrected energy should be lower than the energy without correction because the repulsive monopole-monopole interaction is much larger than the attractive dipole-dipole interaction. But I got the opposite result. Actually, all the correction energies for the monopole-monopole and dipole-dipole had plus values. Can you explain me the reason why the energy correction for monopole-monopole interaction is also larger than zero like that of dipole-dipole interaction?

Thank you.


<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Last edited by cyc99 on Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

tlchan

Monopole & Dipole correction

#2 Post by tlchan » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:11 am

The total energy of a charged periodic system is infinite. The uncorrected total energy is not infinity, and is equivalent to a charged system neutralized electrostatically by a jellium. For the case of O2 anion (negatively charged), the self-consistent potential should be pushed up relative to the neutral system. However, for a plane-wave code, the average of the self-consistent potential is always set to be the reference zero. The overall result is that there is over-screening by the jellium, and a cell-size dependence of the total energy. The monopole correction tries to correct the electrostatic energy because of how the plane-wave code define the vacuum level. You can refer to the VASP manual and the cited references within for details.
Last edited by tlchan on Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply